Self-Esteem Test (Rosenberg Scale)
The RSES (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) is a 10-item self-report questionnaire that measures global self-esteem, scored 0–30, with 15–25 conventionally read as the typical range and below 15 as low self-esteem. Public domain scale validated across many cultures and age groups.
For professional reference, research, and education only. Not for diagnosis or medical advice.
The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) is a 10-item measure of global self-esteem developed by sociologist Morris Rosenberg and first published in 1965 [1]. It is one of the most frequently used self-esteem measures and has been translated and validated in many languages [3]. The University of Maryland Department of Sociology states that the scale is in the public domain and may be used without charge or notifying the department.
What does the RSES measure?
Self-esteem refers to the overall subjective sense of personal value and worth: how positively or negatively a person regards themselves. Rosenberg defined self-esteem as "a positive or negative attitude toward the self" [1]: not arrogance or superiority, but a realistic appreciation of one's own value as a person.
Healthy self-esteem is often described in terms of stability (not fluctuating dramatically with external events), non-contingency (not entirely dependent on performance or approval), and authenticity (based on genuine self-knowledge rather than inflation).
Low self-esteem is considered a vulnerability factor for psychological distress. In 201 adults diagnosed with generalized anxiety disorder or major depressive disorder, lower self-esteem was linked to more severe symptoms through experiential avoidance and lower psychological resilience [5].
High self-esteem is not uniformly beneficial either. A major review found that high self-esteem is a mixed category that includes narcissistic and defensive people, and that self-esteem has not been shown to predict the quality or duration of relationships [7].
How do you give the RSES?
The RSES is a self-report questionnaire: respondents rate 10 statements about themselves on a 4-point scale from Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree. No clinician administration is required, which makes it practical for both research and routine outcome monitoring.
Rate each statement based on how you feel about yourself right now. The RSES is in the public domain.
Negatively worded items (2, 5, 6, 8, 9) are reverse-scored: SA=0, A=1, D=2, SD=3 (positively worded items: SA=3, A=2, D=1, SD=0).
The RSES is not a diagnostic tool: it measures general self-esteem as a personality trait.
How do you score and interpret the RSES?
Normative data from large population samples indicate that scores are influenced by age, gender, and cultural context. The score bands below reflect widely used clinical conventions; they are not derived from a single validated cut-point study, and individual scores should be interpreted in context.
Score interpretation
The RSES uses a 4-point Likert scale (Strongly Agree to Strongly Disagree) across 10 items, yielding a total score of 0–30. Higher scores indicate greater global self-esteem.
| Score range | Conventional interpretation |
|---|---|
| 26–30 | High self-esteem: strong positive self-regard |
| 15–25 | Typical range: generally positive self-evaluation |
| 0–14 | Low self-esteem: consider clinical follow-up |
These three tiers reflect a widely used convention associated with the RSES; they are not derived from a validated sensitivity/specificity study.
Because the RSES captures a trait rather than a symptom severity score, individual results should be interpreted alongside other clinical information, especially in the context of depression or anxiety screening with the PHQ-9 or GAD-7. Validation studies in different countries report their own factor structures and reliability [3] [4], so population-specific norms should be used where available.
Self-esteem dimensions
Rosenberg originally designed the RSES as a unidimensional measure of global self-esteem. Factor-analytic studies, however, have repeatedly identified two factors corresponding to the scale's positively and negatively worded item groupings.
One proposal is that global self-esteem has two substantively distinct dimensions [2]:
| Dimension | Description |
|---|---|
| Self-liking | A sense of social worth: how much one approves of oneself as a social being |
| Self-competence | A sense of personal efficacy: confidence in one's ability to manage challenges |
Independent validation studies have found a two-factor solution for the RSES, labelled variously as "positive self-esteem" and "negative self-esteem," or "self-value" and "perceived personal competence" [3] [4].
This two-factor structure is partly a wording effect: inconsistent responses to positively and negatively worded items can create a second factor, and screening out inconsistent respondents removed most of that wording variance in one study [6]. Accordingly, the RSES total score remains the primary outcome in most research and clinical applications; the two-factor solution is useful mainly for understanding item-level response patterns.
Psychometric properties
- Norwegian adolescents [3]: In two samples aged 14–21 (n = 1,233 and n = 1,816), the RSES showed high reliability and correlated in the expected directions with life satisfaction, stress and self-efficacy; a two-factor solution fitted best.
- Iranian adults [4]: In 533 adults, the Persian version had two factors (positive and negative self-esteem) explaining 59.1% of the variance, with Cronbach's alphas of .828 and .801 and intraclass correlation coefficients of .838 and .875.
- Dominican adults [6]: In 632 adults, once inconsistent respondents (about 8%) were screened out, scores showed good validity and reliability.
- Dimensionality [2]: Structural analysis showed the RSES's dimensionality paralleling a self-liking / self-competence distinction.
Limitations
- Not a diagnosis. The RSES measures global self-esteem as a trait; it does not diagnose depression or any other condition.
- No validated cutoff. The 0–14 / 15–25 / 26–30 tiers are a convention, not the result of a sensitivity/specificity study.
- Norms vary. Mean scores differ by age, gender and culture, so population-specific norms should be used where available.
- Scoring conventions differ. Some studies score items 1–4 (totals 10–40) rather than 0–3 (0–30).
- Self-report. Responses can be influenced by current mood and social desirability.
How does self-esteem relate to mental health?
Research links self-esteem to a range of psychological and behavioural outcomes, though often less strongly than assumed:
| Domain | What the research found |
|---|---|
| Anxiety and depression | In adults with GAD or major depression, lower self-esteem was linked to more severe symptoms through more experiential avoidance and lower resilience [5] |
| Depression | Low self-esteem is more likely than high self-esteem to lead to depression under some circumstances [7] |
| Happiness | Self-esteem has a strong relation to happiness [7] |
| Relationships | People high in self-esteem report better relationships, but objective measures disconfirm most of these beliefs [7] |
| Performance | Correlations with school performance are modest, and high self-esteem is partly a result of good performance; it does help persistence after failure [7] |
| Health behaviours | Effects of self-esteem are generally negligible, with the exception that high self-esteem reduces the chances of bulimia in women [7] |
Because experiential avoidance and resilience appear to carry the link between self-esteem and symptom severity, interventions targeting experiential avoidance may help reduce symptoms [5].
Building self-esteem: therapeutic approaches
Self-esteem work draws on several approaches:
- Cognitive Behavioural Therapy: identifying and challenging self-critical thoughts.
- Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: defusing from self-critical cognitions; values-based living.
- Schema Therapy: targeting early maladaptive schemas such as defectiveness or shame.
- Compassion-focused approaches: self-compassion as an alternative to contingent self-worth.
- Behavioural experiments: testing negative self-predictions through action.
Boosting self-esteem for its own sake has not been shown to cause benefits [7], so the aim is usually a stable, accepting view of oneself rather than a higher score.
For individuals: This page is a clinical reference, not a diagnostic tool. If you have concerns about your own symptoms, bring this information to a qualified mental health professional.
Related
Billing
In the US, the Self-Esteem Test (Rosenberg Scale) is usually billed under these CPT codes. Payer rules vary.
Assessments
FAQ
What is a high score on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale?
On the RSES, scores range from 0 to 30. By widely used convention, scores of 15–25 fall within the typical range and scores of 26 or above suggest high global self-esteem. Because the RSES measures a trait, a high score does not imply inflated or unstable self-esteem: those are separate constructs.
What does a low RSES score mean?
Scores below 15 are conventionally taken to indicate low global self-esteem. Lower self-esteem has been linked to more severe anxiety and depressive symptoms in people with these diagnoses, but the scale is not a diagnostic tool and a low score alone does not constitute a clinical diagnosis.
Is the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale self-report or clinician-administered?
The RSES is a self-report questionnaire. Respondents rate 10 statements about themselves on a 4-point scale. No clinician administration is required, which makes it practical for both research and routine outcome monitoring.
Can the RSES diagnose depression or low self-worth disorders?
No. The RSES measures global self-esteem as a personality trait; it does not diagnose any clinical condition. It is best used alongside condition-specific screeners such as the PHQ-9 or GAD-7 when a full clinical picture is needed.
References
- 1.Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press; 1965.
- 2.Tafarodi RW, Swann WB Jr. Self-liking and self-competence as dimensions of global self-esteem: initial validation of a measure. J Pers Assess. 1995;65(2):322–342.
- 3.Moksnes UK, Espnes GA, Eilertsen MEB, et al. Validation of Rosenberg self-esteem scale among Norwegian adolescents — psychometric properties across samples. BMC Psychol. 2024;12(1):506.
- 4.Ghasempour S, Sharif-Nia H, Nouri S, et al. Validation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale among the Iranian adult population: a cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2025;20(12):e0336969.
- 5.Aral AE, Gerdan G, Aral A, Erdogan E. Self-Esteem and Symptom Severity in General Anxiety Disorder and Major Depressive Disorder: A Serial Mediation Model of Experiential Avoidance and Psychological Resilience. Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2026;63:112-118.
- 6.García-Batista ZE, Guerra-Peña K, Garrido LE, et al. Using Constrained Factor Mixture Analysis to Validate Mixed-Worded Psychological Scales: The Case of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in the Dominican Republic. Front Psychol. 2021;12:636693.
- 7.Baumeister RF, Campbell JD, Krueger JI, Vohs KD. Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles? Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2003;4(1):1-44.
HiBoop does not offer this scale. This page is reference material.This library is an academic and clinical reference. A scale described here is not necessarily offered in HiBoop; each page says whether it is.