Research to cite in a funding application
Our platform is built for measurement-based care. These are the published studies funders ask about, each with the paper's own finding and a link to the source.
Evidence for your application
- Published research you can cite when a grant or RFP asks why measurement-based care. Each finding is the paper's own result, including the null ones, and each title links to the source.
Measurement-based care outcomes
- A Tipping Point for Measurement-Based Care
Fortney JC et al. Psychiatr Serv, 2017 · Narrative review
Of 51 reviewed articles, virtually all randomized trials with frequent, timely symptom feedback to the provider during encounters significantly improved outcomes; one-time screening and infrequent assessment did not.
- Measurement-Based Care Versus Standard Care for Major Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial With Blind Raters
Guo T et al. Am J Psychiatry, 2015 · Randomized trial
In a 24-week trial in outpatient major depression, measurement-based care raised remission to 73.8% versus 28.8% with standard treatment and shortened time to response.
- The Efficacy of Measurement-Based Care for Depressive Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Zhu M et al. J Clin Psychiatry, 2021 · Meta-analysis
Across 7 RCTs (2,019 participants) on depression pharmacotherapy, MBC was associated with higher remission, lower endpoint severity and better medication adherence; response rates did not differ significantly.
- Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes in Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Husain MI et al. JAMA Netw Open, 2025 · Randomized trial
In 154 adults with major depression in low-resource settings, MBC led to faster time to response and remission than standard care; week-24 response and remission rates did not differ.
- A Tipping Point for Measurement-Based Care
Routine outcome monitoring
- Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: A multilevel meta-analysis
de Jong K et al. Clin Psychol Rev, 2021 · Meta-analysis
Across 58 studies (21,699 participants), progress feedback had a small significant effect on symptom reduction (d = 0.15) and a small improvement in dropout rates.
- Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults
Kendrick T et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2016 · Systematic review
Pooling 12 trials (3,696 participants) using OQ-45 or ORS feedback found no clear symptom difference versus no feedback; the authors rated this evidence low quality.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Measurement Feedback Systems in Treatment for Common Mental Health Disorders
Rognstad K et al. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2023 · Meta-analysis
Across 31 randomized studies, measurement feedback systems had a small positive effect on mental health outcomes (d = 0.14), larger for not-on-track clients (d = 0.29).
- The effects of routine outcome monitoring (ROM) on therapy outcomes in the course of an implementation process: A randomized clinical trial
Brattland H et al. J Couns Psychol, 2018 · Randomized trial
Among 170 adults in outpatient therapy, clients randomized to routine outcome monitoring were 2.5 times more likely to improve than with treatment as usual (d = 0.26).
- Using progress feedback to improve outcomes and reduce drop-out, treatment duration, and deterioration: A multilevel meta-analysis
Feedback-informed care
- Collecting and delivering progress feedback: A meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring
Lambert MJ, Whipple JL, Kleinstauber M Psychotherapy (Chic), 2018 · Meta-analysis
Across 24 studies, two-thirds found ROM-assisted psychotherapy superior to treatment as usual; feedback reduced deterioration and nearly doubled reliable change rates in clients predicted to have a poor outcome.
- Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure: meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system
Shimokawa K, Lambert MJ, Smart DW J Consult Clin Psychol, 2010 · Meta-analysis
Reanalysis of six studies (N = 6,151) found Outcome Questionnaire-45 progress feedback enhanced treatment outcome, especially for clients flagged as at risk of treatment failure.
- The effect of using the Partners for Change Outcome Management System as feedback tool in psychotherapy-A systematic review and meta-analysis
Ostergard OK, Randa H, Hougaard E Psychother Res, 2020 · Meta-analysis
Across 18 controlled studies, PCOMS feedback had a small overall effect on general symptoms (g = 0.27), with no effect in psychiatric settings.
- Collecting and delivering progress feedback: A meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring
Putting measurement into practice
- Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review
Lewis CC et al. JAMA Psychiatry, 2019 · Narrative review
MBC can expedite improvement and detect deterioration yet is underused; the review maps barriers at client, practitioner, organization and system levels and strategies to address them.
- Monitoring Treatment Progress and Providing Feedback is Viewed Favorably but Rarely Used in Practice
Jensen-Doss A et al. Adm Policy Ment Health, 2018 · Implementation study
In a survey of 504 clinicians, attitudes toward monitoring and feedback were generally positive, but only 13.9% used standardized progress measures at least monthly.
- Standardized Versus Tailored Implementation of Measurement-Based Care for Depression in Community Mental Health Clinics
Lewis CC et al. Psychiatr Serv, 2022 · Randomized trial
In a 12-clinic cluster-randomized trial, tailored MBC implementation raised PHQ-9 completion at 5 months versus standardized implementation; neither approach predicted week-12 depression severity.
- Steps for implementing measurement-based care: Implementation planning guide development and use in quality improvement
Dollar KM et al. Psychol Serv, 2020 · Implementation study
Presents a Veterans Health Administration MBC implementation planning guide, noting The Joint Commission revised its behavioral health care standards in January 2018 to require MBC.
- Implementing Measurement-Based Care in Behavioral Health: A Review
Collaborative care
- Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial
Unutzer J et al. JAMA, 2002 · Randomized trial
Among 1,801 adults aged 60 or older, 45% receiving IMPACT collaborative care had a 50% or greater symptom reduction at 12 months versus 19% with usual care.
- Collaborative care for depression and anxiety problems
Archer J et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2012 · Systematic review
Across 79 RCTs (24,308 participants), collaborative care improved depression and anxiety outcomes versus usual care in the short, medium and long term.
- Collaborative care for depression: a cumulative meta-analysis and review of longer-term outcomes
Gilbody S et al. Arch Intern Med, 2006 · Meta-analysis
Across 37 randomized studies (12,355 participants), collaborative care improved depression outcomes at 6 months (SMD 0.25), with evidence of longer-term benefit up to 5 years.
- Comparative effectiveness of collaborative chronic care models for mental health conditions across primary, specialty, and behavioral health care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis
Woltmann E et al. Am J Psychiatry, 2012 · Meta-analysis
Across 57 trials, collaborative chronic care models improved depression, mental and physical quality of life and social role function (d 0.20 to 0.33); total costs did not differ.
- Collaborative care management of late-life depression in the primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial
Children and youth
- Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: results of a randomized trial
Bickman L et al. Psychiatr Serv, 2011 · Randomized trial
In a cluster trial across 28 sites, youths whose clinicians received weekly measurement feedback improved faster than youths at sites without weekly feedback.
- Client feedback in psychological therapy for children and adolescents with mental health problems
Bergman H et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018 · Systematic review
Six RCTs (1,097 youths aged 11 to 18) gave very low-certainty evidence, so the review found insufficient evidence for firm conclusions about client feedback in youth therapy.
- Collaborative care for adolescents with depression in primary care: a randomized clinical trial
Richardson LP et al. JAMA, 2014 · Randomized trial
Among 101 adolescents with depression in primary care, collaborative care produced greater symptom improvement at 12 months, with response 67.6% versus 38.6% under usual care.
- Integrated Medical-Behavioral Care Compared With Usual Primary Care for Child and Adolescent Behavioral Health: A Meta-analysis
Asarnow JR et al. JAMA Pediatr, 2015 · Meta-analysis
Across 31 trials (13,129 participants), integrated medical-behavioral care outperformed usual primary care on youth behavioral health outcomes (d = 0.32), with the strongest effects for collaborative care models.
- Effects of routine feedback to clinicians on mental health outcomes of youths: results of a randomized trial
Substance use
- Collaborative Care for Opioid and Alcohol Use Disorders in Primary Care: The SUMMIT Randomized Clinical Trial
Watkins KE et al. JAMA Intern Med, 2017 · Randomized trial
Among primary care adults with opioid or alcohol use disorders, collaborative care increased treatment receipt (39.0% vs 16.8%) and abstinence from opioids or alcohol at 6 months (32.8% vs 22.3%).
- Collaborative Care for Opioid Use Disorder in Primary Care: A Hybrid Type 2 Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial
Fortney JC et al. JAMA Psychiatry, 2025 · Randomized trial
Across 254 participants with opioid use disorder, collaborative care with measurement-based care reduced opioid use more than control (d = -0.44); mental health scores did not differ.
- A systematic review on the effect of routine outcome monitoring and feedback on client outcomes in alcohol and other drug treatment
Cordony I et al. Drug Alcohol Rev, 2023 · Systematic review
Of ten studies in alcohol and other drug treatment, some found feedback improved retention, functioning, alliance or mood, but evidence is too limited for firm conclusions.
- Collaborative Care for Opioid and Alcohol Use Disorders in Primary Care: The SUMMIT Randomized Clinical Trial
Measurement-based care
…starts with what we measure, and how long.
Send your first check-in today, with your own assessments and clients. For teams, we set up your assessments and schedules with you. Prefer a guided start? Book a demo on the next page.
Start- Everything in HiBoop, by workflow, and what shipped lately.Features
- 100+ validated measures, with scoring guides and sources.Assessments