PANAS: Positive and Negative Affect Schedule

The PANAS (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that measures positive affect (PA) and negative affect (NA), each scored 10–50, over a chosen time frame such as right now, the past week, or in general.

For professional reference, research, and education only. Not for diagnosis or medical advice.

The PANAS (Positive and Negative Affect Schedule) is a 20-item self-report measure of mood and affect: ten items measure Positive Affect (PA) and ten measure Negative Affect (NA), each scored 10–50 [1].

What does the PANAS measure?

The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) was developed by David Watson, Lee Anna Clark, and Auke Tellegen to measure two dominant dimensions of mood: Positive Affect (PA) and Negative Affect (NA). These two dimensions are relatively independent (not opposite ends of one scale), and the two scales are largely uncorrelated [1].

  • High PA indicates high energy, engagement, and positive mood. Low PA is characteristic of depression rather than anxiety [4].
  • High NA indicates distress, nervousness, and negative mood; this general distress is shared by anxiety and depression [4].

For depression and anxiety symptoms themselves, use the PHQ-9 or GAD-7; for overall life satisfaction, the SWLS. Check the copyright holder's terms before clinical or commercial use of the PANAS.

How do you give the PANAS?

The 20 items are common mood descriptors, 10 reflecting positive affect (e.g., excited, enthusiastic, attentive) and 10 reflecting negative affect (e.g., distressed, upset, nervous).

Each is rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Very slightly or not at all, 5 = Extremely) based on the respondent's current state or a specified time frame (today, past week, in general). It is self-report; no clinician administration or scoring is required.

Rate each word based on how you feel right now or select your preferred time frame below.

Educational reference only. Cannot diagnose or replace clinical evaluation.

How do you score and interpret the PANAS?

PA and NA subscale scores are each summed across their 10 items (range 10–50). The two subscales are interpreted separately; they are not combined into a single total, and no fixed severity cutoffs have been established in the literature.

Score reference

The original paper presented normative data [1]. For the "in general" instruction, the PA mean is about 35 and the NA mean about 18.

Positive Affect (PA)

Items: interested, excited, strong, enthusiastic, proud, alert, inspired, determined, attentive, active

Negative Affect (NA)

Items: distressed, upset, guilty, scared, hostile, irritable, ashamed, nervous, jittery, afraid

Psychometric properties

  • Original development. The two 10-item scales were highly internally consistent, largely uncorrelated, and stable at appropriate levels over a 2-month period, with factorial and external evidence of convergent and discriminant validity [1].
  • Substance users. In 416 outpatient substance users, Cronbach's alpha was 0.90 for Positive Affect and 0.91 for Negative Affect, with acceptable baseline-to-week-1 test-retest reliability (PA 0.80, NA 0.76) [3].
  • Emotional disorders. In 595 Spanish adults with depressive, anxiety, or adjustment disorders, the online version kept its two-factor structure, with good internal consistency and sensitivity to change [2].

Limitations

  • Not diagnostic. The PANAS measures affect dimensions that relate to, but are distinct from, diagnostic categories.
  • No clinical cutoffs. Scores are compared against normative means, not validated severity bands.
  • Time frame matters. Norms differ by instruction (right now, past week, in general), so scores are only comparable when the same time frame is used.
  • Self-report. Ratings reflect the respondent's own perception of their mood.

For individuals: This page is a clinical reference, not a diagnostic tool. If you have concerns about your own symptoms, bring this information to a qualified mental health professional.

Related

FAQ

  • Is the PANAS self-report or clinician-administered?

    The PANAS is a self-report measure. Respondents rate each of the 20 mood descriptors themselves on a 5-point scale. No clinician administration or scoring is required, making it practical for routine outcome monitoring in clinical and research settings.

  • How is the PANAS scored?

    The PANAS produces two independent subscale scores. The 10 Positive Affect items are summed to give a PA score (range 10–50), and the 10 Negative Affect items are summed to give an NA score (range 10–50). The two subscales are interpreted separately: they are not combined into a single total score.

  • What is a typical PANAS score?

    In the original 1988 normative data using the 'in general' time frame, the mean for Positive Affect was about 35 and for Negative Affect about 18. Scores substantially below the PA mean or above the NA mean may warrant further clinical attention, but no fixed severity cutoffs have been established in the literature.

  • Can the PANAS diagnose depression or anxiety?

    The PANAS is not a diagnostic tool. It measures the dimensions of positive and negative affect, which are related to but distinct from diagnostic categories. Low Positive Affect is a characteristic feature of depression, while high Negative Affect (general distress) is shared by depression and anxiety. Clinical diagnosis requires a comprehensive evaluation by a qualified clinician.

References

    1. 1.Watson D, Clark LA, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063-1070.
    2. 2.Díaz-García A, González-Robles A, Mor S, et al. Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): psychometric properties of the online Spanish version in a clinical sample with emotional disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):56.
    3. 3.Serafini K, Malin-Mayor B, Nich C, Hunkele K, Carroll KM. Psychometric properties of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in a heterogeneous sample of substance users. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2016;42(2):203-212.
    4. 4.Clark LA, Watson D. Tripartite model of anxiety and depression: psychometric evidence and taxonomic implications. J Abnorm Psychol. 1991;100(3):316-336.

This library is an academic and clinical reference. A scale described here is not necessarily offered in HiBoop; each page says whether it is.