Depression Interactive Interpreter

Zung SDS: Self-Rating Depression Scale

The Zung SDS (Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire that measures affective, somatic, psychomotor and psychological symptoms of depression (Zung, 1965). The raw total converts to an SDS Index of 25–100, with 50 or above conventionally indicating clinically meaningful depressive symptoms.

Zung SDS Score Interpreter

Mild depression

SDS Index 50–59 corresponds to mild to moderate depressive symptoms.

20 items rated 1–4; 10 items reverse-scored. Raw total (20–80) converted to SDS Index = (raw ÷ 80) × 100. Higher Index = more depressive symptoms.

SDS IndexInterpretation
70+Severe depressionSDS Index ≥70 corresponds to severe depressive symptoms.
60–69Moderate depressionSDS Index 60–69 corresponds to moderate to marked depressive symptoms.
50–59Mild depressionSDS Index 50–59 corresponds to mild to moderate depressive symptoms.
25–49Normal rangeSDS Index below 50 indicates minimal or no clinically significant depressive symptoms.

Zung WW (1965). SDS Index severity ranges per Zung's conventional cutoffs — a commonly used clinical convention. Educational reference only — not a diagnostic tool.

For reference only — not an assessment, diagnosis, or medical advice. This page provides scoring reference material; interpretation and clinical decisions rest with a qualified clinician.

The Zung SDS is a 20-item validated self-report measure of depression covering affective, somatic, psychomotor, and psychological symptoms. Scores expressed as an SDS Index (25–100). One of the most widely used depression scales in clinical research since 1965.

What the Zung SDS measures

The Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) was developed by William W. K. Zung at Duke University Medical Center in 1965, making it one of the earliest validated self-report measures of depression. Zung designed it to quantify depression based on a dimensional model, covering affective, physiological, psychomotor, and psychological symptoms across 20 items.

Each item is rated on a 4-point frequency scale (1–4). Ten items are negatively worded and scored directly; ten are positively worded and reverse-scored. The raw total (20–80) is converted to an SDS Index by multiplying by 100/80. An SDS Index of 50 or above indicates the presence of depression. The scale covers 20 characteristic signs and symptoms of depression, including sad affect, crying, sleep disturbance, appetite change, and hopelessness.

Check the copyright holder's terms before clinical or commercial use. The Zung SDS has been translated into over 30 languages. While the PHQ-9 is now more commonly used in primary care settings, the Zung SDS remains a reference standard in longitudinal research and is useful where a classic scale is required for comparison with historical data.

How to administer the Zung SDS

The Zung SDS is a self-report questionnaire that respondents complete independently, without clinician administration, which makes it practical for screening in primary care and research. Each of the 20 statements is rated on a 4-point frequency scale from 1 (a little of the time) to 4 (most of the time). A clinician should review the results before any diagnostic conclusion.

Rate how each statement applies to you right now or over the past several days.

Educational reference only. Cannot diagnose or replace clinical evaluation.

Zung SDS scoring and interpretation

Zung (1965). SDS Index = (raw score / 80) × 100. Raw scores range from 20 to 80. Use the score interpreter above to look up an Index: below 50 is the normal range, 50–59 mild, 60–69 moderate to marked and 70 or above severe. These ranges are a commonly used clinical convention.

Psychometric properties

  • Validity (Biggs et al., 1978): In 26 depressed outpatients treated with a tricyclic antidepressant, the Zung SDS correlated 0.69 with the treating physician's global rating; in 41 patients it correlated highly with the Hamilton Rating Scale, and it distinguished four severity groups.
  • Spanish version (Ruiz-Grosso et al., 2012): In 194 patients in Lima, Peru, Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 and the area under the ROC curve was 0.84 for separating major depression from other psychiatric disorders and 0.96 for separating it from no psychiatric disorder (optimal cut-offs, as reported in that study, of ≥47 and ≥45).
  • Older adults (Jokelainen et al., 2019): In 520 community-dwelling adults aged 72–73 in Finland, the area under the curve was 0.85; the optimal cut-off point of 39 gave a sensitivity of 79.2% and specificity of 72.2%, with a positive predictive value of 12.5% and a negative predictive value of 98.6%.

Limitations

  • Screening, not diagnosis. The Zung SDS quantifies depressive symptoms; a diagnosis needs a clinical evaluation.
  • Cutoffs vary. Optimal cut-offs differ across languages, ages and settings, and the Index bands are a convention.
  • Low positive predictive value in community samples. In older community adults, most positive screens were false positives (PPV 12.5%).
  • Self-report. Results depend on the respondent's recall and candour.

Measuring depression in HiBoop

HiBoop does not offer the Zung SDS; this page is reference material. For depression, HiBoop offers the PHQ-9 and PHQ-8, with automated scoring and tracking over time.

For reference only — not an assessment, diagnosis, or medical advice. This page provides scoring reference material; interpretation and clinical decisions rest with a qualified clinician.

HiBoop does not offer this scale. This page is reference material.This library is an academic and clinical reference. A scale described here is not necessarily offered in HiBoop; each page says whether it is.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the Zung SDS scored?

Each of the 20 items is rated on a 4-point frequency scale (1 = a little of the time, 4 = most of the time). Ten positively worded items are reverse-scored. The raw total (20–80) is then converted to an SDS Index by multiplying by 100 and dividing by 80, yielding a score between 25 and 100.

What does a high Zung SDS score mean?

An SDS Index of 50 or above is the conventional threshold for clinically meaningful depressive symptoms. Scores of 50–59 are considered mild, 60–69 moderate to marked, and 70 or above severe. These ranges reflect commonly used clinical conventions established by Zung (1965) and should be interpreted by a qualified clinician.

Is the Zung SDS a self-report or clinician-administered scale?

The Zung SDS is a self-report questionnaire — respondents complete it independently, without clinician administration. This makes it practical for screening in primary care and research settings. A clinician should review results and conduct a full evaluation before making any diagnosis.

Can the Zung SDS diagnose depression?

No. The Zung SDS is a screening tool that quantifies the presence and severity of depressive symptoms; it cannot provide a diagnosis. A formal clinical evaluation, including a structured interview and review of history, is required for diagnosis. Biggs et al. (1978) confirmed the scale correlates well with clinician severity ratings, supporting its use as a research and monitoring tool.

Bill this assessment

The Zung SDS: Self-Rating Depression Scale qualifies for reimbursement under these CPT codes (US).

What's Next

Measurement-based care in practice

For clinicians

HiBoop does not offer this scale. For the scales it does offer, HiBoop automates delivery, scoring and longitudinal tracking across your patient panel.

For individuals

This page is a clinical reference, not a diagnostic tool. If you have concerns about your own symptoms, bring this information to a qualified mental health professional.

References

  1. 1.
    Zung WW. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12:63-70.View source
  2. 2.
    Biggs JT, Wylie LT, Ziegler VE. Validity of the Zung Self-rating Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1978;132:381-385.View source
  3. 3.
    Jokelainen J, Timonen M, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S, et al. Validation of the Zung self-rating depression scale (SDS) in older adults. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2019;37(3):353-357.View source
  4. 4.
    Ruiz-Grosso P, Loret de Mola C, Vega-Dienstmaier JM, et al. Validation of the Spanish Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression and Zung Self-Rating Depression Scales: a comparative validation study. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e45413.View source

Last reviewed: Jun 3, 2026