Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS-61) Scoring & Interpretation
The WURS-61 (Wender Utah Rating Scale) is a 61-item self-report questionnaire in which adults rate their childhood symptoms (about ages 5–10) to establish the early onset required for an adult ADHD diagnosis. Clinical scoring sums 25 of the items (the WURS-25, 0–100), and a score of 46 or higher is consistent with childhood ADHD (Ward, Wender & Reimherr, 1993).
WURS-25 Score Calculator
Enter each of the 25 scored items (0–4) to total them and see the band. Item numbers here are positions 1–25 on the WURS-25 form, NOT item numbers on the 61-item form — Ward et al. (1993) selected the 25 items empirically and did not publish a mapping onto the WURS-61 numbering, so this cannot tell you which of the 61 items to use. Scoring aid only — it does not diagnose.
Score below borderline range. Recall bias from current mood disorders should be considered if the clinical picture is otherwise suggestive.
0 of 25 items entered — 25 still blank. The total can only rise, so treat the band above as provisional.
- 0
- Not at all/Slightly
- 1
- Mildly
- 2
- Moderately
- 3
- Quite a bit
- 4
- Very much
Each item scores 0–4. Items are numbered, not reproduced — enter them from the form in front of you.
For reference only — not an assessment, diagnosis, or medical advice. This page provides scoring reference material; interpretation and clinical decisions rest with a qualified clinician.
WURS-25 Score Interpreter
Subthreshold elevation. Consider collateral history, childhood records, and comorbidities before concluding.
Sum the 25 scored WURS-25 items only (not all 61). Each item is rated 0–4; maximum total is 100. Higher scores indicate greater retrospective childhood ADHD symptom burden.
| WURS-25 total score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 46+ | Consistent with childhood ADHDAt this threshold Ward et al. (1993) correctly classified 86% of adults with ADHD, 99% of non-clinical adults, and 81% of adults with unipolar depression. Supports childhood onset; combine with current-symptom screening. |
| 25–45 | Borderline — clinical judgment requiredSubthreshold elevation. Consider collateral history, childhood records, and comorbidities before concluding. |
| 0–24 | Not consistent with childhood ADHDScore below borderline range. Recall bias from current mood disorders should be considered if the clinical picture is otherwise suggestive. |
Ward MF et al. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150(6):885-890. Cutoff ≥46 per Ward et al. (1993); borderline range 25–45 reflects a commonly used clinical convention.
For reference only — not an assessment, diagnosis, or medical advice. This page provides scoring reference material; interpretation and clinical decisions rest with a qualified clinician.
Foundational Context
Developed by Ward, Wender, and Reimherr (1993), the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS) was created to evaluate childhood behaviours associated with ADHD in adults. It supports the DSM-5-TR requirement that ADHD symptoms were present before age 12.
The WURS is unique in its focus on the "Utah Criteria" for ADHD, which includes emotional dysregulation and mood lability in addition to classic core symptoms of inattention and hyperactivity.
What the WURS-61 measures
The full WURS-61 consists of 61 retrospective items. However, clinical scoring typically uses a specific subset of 25 items (the WURS-25). When clinicians refer to a "WURS score," they mean the WURS-25 total. Adults rate how they experienced symptoms during childhood (approximately ages 5–10) on a 5-point scale (0 = Not at all/Slightly, 1 = Mildly, 2 = Moderately, 3 = Quite a bit, 4 = Very much). The remaining 36 items are not included in the scored total but may be reviewed clinically.
Core Childhood Symptom Domains:
- Attention & Concentration: Trouble concentrating, daydreaming, difficulty completing work.
- Impulsivity: Acting before thinking, getting into trouble, impulsive planning.
- Behavior & Conduct: Fighting with children, being rebellious, trouble at school.
- Academic & Learning: Trouble with reading or arithmetic, underachieving.
- Emotional Dysregulation: Moody, irritability, hot temper, low frustration tolerance.
How to administer the WURS-61
- Format: Self-administered, typically 10 minutes. Check the copyright holder's terms before clinical or commercial use. Validated in English, Dutch, Italian, and Spanish.
- Instructions: Rate symptoms based on childhood experience (ages 5–10) only.
- Scoring: Sum only the designated 25 items for the WURS-25 total.
- Integration: Best used alongside the ASRS. Administer the ASRS at intake to screen for current ADHD symptoms; if Part A is positive (4+ responses), follow up with the WURS-61 to assess childhood onset. A positive ASRS combined with a WURS-25 score ≥46 provides the strongest support for an adult ADHD diagnosis, satisfying both the current impairment and childhood onset criteria in DSM-5-TR. Corroborate with childhood records or parent reports where possible; for clients still in the 6–12 age range, the parent- and teacher-rated NICHQ Vanderbilt scoring tools assess current pediatric ADHD symptoms directly rather than retrospectively.
- Documentation: Record the WURS-25 total score in the Objective section of your note, with the interpretation (e.g., "WURS-25: 52, consistent with childhood ADHD onset").
WURS-61 scoring and interpretation
Sum only the 25 WURS-25 items for the clinical score (maximum 100). Use the calculator and score interpreter above to total the items and look up the band.
- 0–24: Not consistent with childhood ADHD.
- 25–45: Borderline, clinical judgment required. Consider collateral history.
- ≥36: Elevated, higher sensitivity cutoff (used in some settings).
- ≥46: Consistent with childhood ADHD. Ward et al. (1993) reported 86% sensitivity at this threshold, with 99% correctly classified among non-clinical adults and 81% among adults with unipolar depression.
Important: The WURS establishes childhood onset; the ASRS (Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale) should be used to screen for current symptoms.
Psychometric properties
- Internal consistency: Cronbach’s α ≈ 0.94.
- Sensitivity: 86% (at cutoff ≥ 46).
- Specificity: 99% vs. non-clinical adults; 81% vs. adults with unipolar depression (both at cutoff ≥ 46). Quote the 81% figure when the differential is depression — that is the discrimination the scale finds hardest, since current mood colours recall of childhood.
- Discriminative accuracy: AUC 0.956 (95% CI 0.946–0.965) in a Norwegian sample of 1,554 adults (Brevik et al., 2020).
- Factor structure: three factors — aggressiveness and social problems, learning and attention problems, and dysthymia (Brevik et al., 2020; α = 0.954 / 0.919 / 0.897). Stanton & Watson (2016) recovered a comparable three-factor solution but found the factors did not discriminate ADHD from other psychopathology specifically, so treat an elevated total as a prompt for assessment rather than evidence of ADHD in particular.
- Validation: Ward et al. (1993).
Limitations
- Recall Bias: Current mood (especially depression) can distort retrospective reporting.
- Not Diagnostic Alone: Requires a full clinical interview and collateral history.
- Utah Criteria: Some items may not map directly to current DSM-5-TR ADHD symptom descriptions.
This library is an academic and clinical reference. A scale described here is not necessarily offered in HiBoop; each page says whether it is.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between the WURS-61 and the WURS-25?
The WURS-61 is the full 61-item questionnaire. Clinical scoring uses only the 25 items that most strongly differentiate adults with ADHD from non-clinical adults and depressed adults — this subset is called the WURS-25. When clinicians report a WURS score, they mean the WURS-25 total; the remaining 36 items are not counted but may be reviewed clinically.
What is a high WURS-25 score?
A score of 46 or higher on the WURS-25 (maximum 100) is considered elevated and consistent with childhood ADHD. In the original validation study (Ward et al., 1993), this cutoff correctly identified 86% of adults with ADHD, 99% of non-clinical adults, and 81% of adults with unipolar depression. The lower figure against the depressed group matters clinically: separating retrospective ADHD from depression is the harder discrimination, because current low mood colours how childhood is recalled. Scores between 25 and 45 are considered borderline and require clinical judgment.
Is the WURS self-report or clinician-administered?
The WURS is a self-report questionnaire. Adults complete it independently by recalling their own behaviour and experiences during childhood (approximately ages 5–10). It takes roughly 10 minutes to complete. Check the copyright holder's terms before clinical or commercial use.
Can the WURS alone confirm an ADHD diagnosis?
No. The WURS supports — but cannot substitute for — a full clinical interview. A positive WURS-25 score establishes retrospective childhood onset, which is one DSM-5-TR criterion for adult ADHD. Current symptoms must be confirmed separately (e.g., using the ASRS), and collateral history or childhood records should be obtained where possible.
Bill this assessment
The Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS-61) Scoring & Interpretation qualifies for reimbursement under these CPT codes (US).
Using this assessment in practice
For clinicians
Automate assessment delivery, scoring, and longitudinal tracking across your patient panel. See how practices go live in 48 hours.
For individuals
This page is a clinical reference, not a diagnostic tool. If you have concerns about your own symptoms, bring this information to a qualified mental health professional.
References
- 1.Ward MF, Wender PH, Reimherr FW. The Wender Utah Rating Scale: an aid in the retrospective diagnosis of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1993;150(6):885-890.View source
- 2.Brevik EJ, Lundervold AJ, Haavik J, Posserud MB. Validity and accuracy of the Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) Self-Report Scale (ASRS) and the Wender Utah Rating Scale (WURS) symptom checklists in discriminating between adults with and without ADHD. Brain Behav. 2020;10(6):e01605.View source
- 3.Fossati A, Di Ceglie A, Acquarini E, Donati D, Donini M, Novella L, Maffei C. The retrospective assessment of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adults: reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Wender Utah Rating Scale. Compr Psychiatry. 2001;42(4):326-336.View source
- 4.Stanton K, Watson D. An Examination of the Structure and Construct Validity of the Wender Utah Rating Scale. J Pers Assess. 2016;98(5):545-552.View source
Last reviewed: Jun 3, 2026
Related Assessments
Explore complementary clinical tools and screeners