Substance Use

Internet Gaming Disorder Scale – Short Form (IGDS9-SF)

The IGDS9-SF is a 9-item self-report tool that assesses the severity of Internet Gaming Disorder (IGD) symptoms based on the DSM-5-TR criteria. It is widely used to screen for problematic gaming behavior and support early identification of gaming-related functional impairment. The Internet Gaming Disorder Scale – Short Form (IGDS9-SF) is a tool designed to assess the severity of internet gaming disorder symptoms.

Use at intake or when gaming-related impairment is suspected. Reassess every 3–6 months if monitoring symptom severity or treatment progress.

About the IGDS9-SF

Developed by Pontes and Griffiths (2015), the IGDS9-SF is grounded in the DSM-5-TR’s proposed criteria for Internet Gaming Disorder. It captures psychological dependence, loss of control, preoccupation, withdrawal, and negative consequences of excessive gaming. Each item corresponds to one of the nine DSM-5-TR criteria for IGD.

The IGDS9-SF has been validated internationally and is suitable for use in both clinical and research contexts, including adolescent and adult populations.

Psychometric Properties

The IGDS9-SF has demonstrated strong psychometric validity, including:

  • Internal consistency: Cronbach’s α = 0.88–0.91
  • Unidimensional factor structure
  • Correlates strongly with depression, anxiety, and time spent gaming

It is considered one of the most robust brief IGD screeners available across multiple languages and cultural groups.

Sources: Pontes & Griffiths, 2015; Pontes et al., 2021

The Scale

The IGDS9-SF includes 9 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Never) to 5 (Very often), reflecting behaviors over the past 12 months.

Example item: “Have you continued your gaming activity despite knowing it was causing problems between you and other people?”

Total scores range from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater IGD symptom severity.

Score Range

There is no universally agreed cutoff, but suggested ranges include:

  • 9–20: Low or no risk
  • 21–35: Moderate risk; monitor closely
  • 36–45: High risk; further assessment recommended

A clinical diagnosis of IGD should be made by a trained professional and requires meeting five or more criteria with associated distress or impairment.

Disclaimer:This summary is for informational purposes only. The IGDS9-SF is a screening tool, not a diagnostic instrument. HiBoop does not interpret or score assessments. Clinical evaluation is required to confirm Internet Gaming Disorder.

References

  1. 1.
    Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. Measuring DSM-5 internet gaming disorder: Development and validation of a short psychometric scale. Comput Human Behav. 2015;45:137-143.View source
  2. 2.
    Pontes HM, Griffiths MD. Portuguese Validation of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short-Form. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2016;19(4):288-293.View source
  3. 3.
    Poon LYJ, Tsang HWH, Chan TYJ, et al. Psychometric Properties of the Internet Gaming Disorder Scale-Short-Form (IGDS9-SF): Systematic Review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(10):e26821.View source
© 2015 Pontes & Griffiths. Freely available for non-commercial research and clinical use with citation.

Frequently Asked Questions

How is the IGDS9-SF scored?

The IGDS9-SF contains 9 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 (Never) to 5 (Very often). Total scores range from 9 to 45, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Each item maps directly onto one of the nine DSM-5-TR criteria for Internet Gaming Disorder.

Is the IGDS9-SF self-report or clinician-administered?

The IGDS9-SF is a self-report measure completed by the respondent without clinician involvement. It is suitable for both clinical screening and research contexts across adolescent and adult populations.

Can the IGDS9-SF diagnose Internet Gaming Disorder?

No. The IGDS9-SF is a screening instrument designed to assess symptom severity, not to establish a diagnosis. A diagnosis of Internet Gaming Disorder requires a clinical evaluation by a qualified professional and, per DSM-5-TR, the endorsement of five or more criteria with associated distress or functional impairment.

How widely has the IGDS9-SF been validated?

A 2021 systematic review (Poon et al.) covering 21 studies and 15 language versions found that the IGDS9-SF consistently demonstrates adequate internal consistency, a unidimensional factor structure, and strong criterion validity. It is among the most cross-culturally replicated brief measures for problematic gaming.