IES-R: Impact of Event Scale-Revised
22-item trauma impact measure with Intrusion, Avoidance, and Hyperarousal subscales. Score 0–88; ≥33 PTSD likely. Most widely used PTSD symptom scale in international trauma research. Weiss & Marmar (1997).
IES-R Score Calculator
Enter each of the 22 items (0–4) to total them and see the band. Items are numbered, not reproduced — enter them from the form in front of you. Scoring aid only; it does not diagnose.
Score below the moderate symptoms convention threshold. Ongoing monitoring may still be appropriate following trauma exposure.
0 of 22 items entered — 22 still blank. The total can only rise, so treat the band above as provisional.
- 0
- Not at all
- 1
- A little bit
- 2
- Moderately
- 3
- Quite a bit
- 4
- Extremely
Each item scores 0–4. Items are numbered, not reproduced — enter them from the form in front of you.
For reference only — not an assessment, diagnosis, or medical advice. This page provides scoring reference material; interpretation and clinical decisions rest with a qualified clinician.
IES-R Score Interpreter
Commonly used clinical convention indicating clinically meaningful symptoms that fall below the full screening threshold. Follow-up assessment warranted.
22 items across Intrusion, Avoidance, and Hyperarousal subscales. Each rated 0–4; sum across all items. Interpreted in reference to a specific traumatic event over the past 7 days.
| Total score | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| 37+ | Severe distressCommonly used clinical convention indicating severe post-traumatic stress response. Warrants urgent clinical assessment. |
| 33–36 | Probable PTSD likely≥33 was identified as the optimal screening cutoff by Creamer, Bell & Failla (2003). Structured clinical evaluation recommended. |
| 24–32 | Moderate/partial PTSD possibleCommonly used clinical convention indicating clinically meaningful symptoms that fall below the full screening threshold. Follow-up assessment warranted. |
| 0–23 | Below screening thresholdScore below the moderate symptoms convention threshold. Ongoing monitoring may still be appropriate following trauma exposure. |
Creamer, Bell & Failla (2003). ≥33 cutoff established in that validation study. The ≥24 and ≥37 thresholds reflect commonly used clinical convention and are not formally established in a single primary source. Educational reference only — not a diagnostic tool.
For reference only — not an assessment, diagnosis, or medical advice. This page provides scoring reference material; interpretation and clinical decisions rest with a qualified clinician.
The IES-R is a 22-item validated measure of subjective distress related to a specific traumatic event. Assesses three PTSD symptom clusters: Intrusion, Avoidance, and Hyperarousal. Score 0–88. Free for clinical and research use. Weiss & Marmar (1997).
What is the IES-R?
The Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) was developed by Daniel Weiss and Charles Marmar (1997) as an update to the original Impact of Event Scale (Horowitz et al., 1979). The revision added a Hyperarousal subscale to bring the scale into alignment with the DSM-IV PTSD diagnostic criteria. It assesses subjective distress specifically related to a specific traumatic event, making it distinct from general PTSD measures.
The IES-R contains 22 items across three subscales: Intrusion (8 items, intrusive thoughts, images, nightmares), Avoidance (8 items, numbing, avoidance of reminders), and Hyperarousal (6 items, irritability, poor concentration, startle response). Each item is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all), 1 (A little bit), 2 (Moderately), 3 (Quite a bit), 4 (Extremely).
The IES-R is free for clinical and research use. It is the most widely used PTSD symptom measure in international trauma research and has been translated into over 20 languages. A total score of ≥33 suggests probable PTSD; ≥37 has been associated with immune function suppression (Weiss, 2007). For DSM-5-TR-aligned PTSD assessment, the PCL-5 is recommended as the primary clinical tool.
Educational reference only. Requires clinical evaluation to confirm PTSD diagnosis.
IES-R Score Interpretation
Weiss & Marmar (1997). Total score cutoffs from Creamer, Bell & Failla (2003) and Weiss (2007).
Trauma Screening Workflows in HiBoop
IES-R alongside PCL-5 and ACE Score, automated scoring and longitudinal tracking for trauma-exposed patients.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the IES-R self-report or clinician-administered?
The IES-R is a self-report questionnaire completed by the individual. It is not a structured clinician interview. Respondents rate 22 items on a 0–4 scale in reference to a specific traumatic event from the past seven days.
What does a score of 33 or higher mean on the IES-R?
A total IES-R score of ≥33 indicates probable PTSD is likely. Creamer, Bell & Failla (2003) found this threshold (equivalent to a mean item rating of 1.5) provided the best diagnostic accuracy in a sample of Vietnam veterans. It is a screening indicator, not a diagnosis.
Can the IES-R diagnose PTSD?
No. The IES-R is a symptom screener, not a diagnostic tool. A high score supports clinical concern and warrants a structured diagnostic evaluation by a qualified clinician. Only a thorough clinical assessment can establish a PTSD diagnosis.
How is the IES-R scored?
Each of the 22 items is rated 0 (Not at all), 1 (A little bit), 2 (Moderately), 3 (Quite a bit), or 4 (Extremely). Total scores range from 0 to 88. Scores can also be reported by subscale: Intrusion (8 items), Avoidance (8 items), and Hyperarousal (6 items).
Bill this assessment
The IES-R: Impact of Event Scale-Revised qualifies for reimbursement under these CPT codes (US).
Using this assessment in practice
For clinicians
Automate assessment delivery, scoring, and longitudinal tracking across your patient panel. See how practices go live in 48 hours.
For individuals
This page is a clinical reference, not a diagnostic tool. If you have concerns about your own symptoms, bring this information to a qualified mental health professional.
References
- 1.Weiss DS, Marmar CR. The Impact of Event Scale-Revised. In: Wilson JP, Keane TM, eds. Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD. Guilford Press. 1997:399-411.
- 2.Creamer M, Bell R, Failla S. Psychometric properties of the Impact of Event Scale-Revised. Behav Res Ther. 2003;41(12):1489-96.View source
- 3.Beck JG, Grant DM, Read JP, Clapp JD, Coffey SF, Miller LM, Palyo SA. The impact of event scale-revised: psychometric properties in a sample of motor vehicle accident survivors. J Anxiety Disord. 2008;22(2):187-98.View source
Last reviewed: Jun 3, 2026
Related Assessments
Explore complementary clinical tools and screeners