Compassion Fatigue Test
For nurses, therapists, and caregivers: measure compassion fatigue and compassion satisfaction.
Compassion Fatigue Test
The cost of caring is real. If you work with people in pain, as a nurse, therapist, social worker, teacher, or family caregiver, you may be absorbing more of that pain than you realize.
What Is Compassion Fatigue?
Compassion fatigue is the emotional and physical exhaustion that results from caring for others who are suffering. It's sometimes called the "cost of caring", the price you pay for showing up, feeling the weight of others' pain, and giving yourself to the work of helping.
Compassion fatigue is distinct from burnout. Burnout is rooted in cumulative workplace stress, workload, poor management, lack of recognition. Compassion fatigue is more specific: it emerges from the repeated exposure to others' trauma and suffering, from the empathic engagement that is, paradoxically, the very thing that makes you good at what you do.
The Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale, developed by Beth Hudnall Stamm, is the most widely used tool for measuring the quality of life among those who help others. It captures three dimensions: Compassion Satisfaction, the meaning and reward you derive from the work; Burnout, feelings of hopelessness, ineffectiveness, and depletion from the job itself; and Secondary Traumatic Stress, the intrusive, hypervigilant, avoidant symptoms that emerge from indirect trauma exposure.
If you've ever gone to your car and cried before your shift starts, you already know what this feels like. If you've noticed that you feel less moved by clients' stories than you used to, or that the suffering doesn't register the way it did at the beginning, that's not hardening. That's a warning sign.
The antidote to compassion fatigue isn't less caring. It's compassion satisfaction, reconnecting to the meaning of the work, building the conditions that allow you to keep giving without being hollowed out by it. This screener measures both.
Compassion Fatigue Screener
Rate each statement based on how often you've experienced it over the past month in your caregiving or professional role.
Score Interpretation
This screener is based on the structure of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQOL) scale, developed by Beth Hudnall Stamm, which is the most widely used instrument for measuring professional quality of life in helping roles. The ProQOL yields three independent subscale scores, each derived from 10 items rated on a 5-point frequency scale (1 = Never to 5 = Very Often). Each subscale ranges from 10 to 50. The subscales must be interpreted separately — they are not combined into a single total.
| Subscale | What it measures | Score range | High score means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compassion Satisfaction | Reward, meaning, and positive energy from the caregiving role | 10–50 | Positive — you are sustaining motivation and fulfillment |
| Burnout | Hopelessness, ineffectiveness, and depletion from the work environment | 10–50 | Concerning — systemic exhaustion is accumulating |
| Secondary Traumatic Stress | Intrusive, hypervigilant, or avoidant symptoms from indirect trauma exposure | 10–50 | Concerning — trauma content from clients is affecting you |
Per the ProQOL scoring manual (Stamm, 2010), scores on each subscale are placed into low, average, and high bands based on normative percentile data. As a clinical convention, scores at or below approximately 22 are considered low, 23–41 average, and 42 or above high — though the manual notes these bands are descriptive guides rather than validated diagnostic cutoffs, and individual context always matters.
Directionality differs across subscales: a high Compassion Satisfaction score is a protective sign. High Burnout or Secondary Traumatic Stress scores are warning signals that warrant attention, ideally with a supervisor, peer, or mental health professional. Research has shown that burnout and secondary traumatic stress are substantially correlated (pooled r ≈ .69 across professions; Cieslak et al., 2014), so elevated scores on both subscales simultaneously are common and reinforce the need for support.
Who Gets Compassion Fatigue?
Compassion fatigue can affect anyone who regularly bears witness to others' pain. Some roles carry a higher structural risk, not because of individual weakness, but because of the nature of the exposure and the systems that surround the work.
Burnout vs Compassion Fatigue: What's the Difference?
They often co-occur, and the distinction matters for how you approach recovery. Treating compassion fatigue like burnout, or vice versa, can mean targeting the wrong root cause.
Burnout
- Rooted in systemic and organizational stress
- Develops gradually over months or years
- Less tied to empathy, more to workload and systems
- Core feeling: "This job is crushing me"
- Improves with organizational change and recovery time
Compassion Fatigue
- Rooted in the relationship with suffering clients or loved ones
- Can develop suddenly after acute trauma exposure
- Empathy is the entry point, caring too deeply, too often
- Core feeling: "Their pain has become part of me"
- Improves with supervision, boundaries, and reconnection to meaning
Recovery Pathways
Recovery from compassion fatigue is possible, but it requires more than a vacation. It requires addressing the structural conditions that create it, alongside personal replenishment.
Evidence-based approaches cluster into three levels:
Individual: Mindfulness-based practices, regular clinical supervision, boundary-setting, and protected recovery time outside of caregiving contexts. A 2015 meta-analysis found that both workplace support (r = −.17) and social support (r = −.26) were protective factors against secondary traumatic stress — meaning connection itself is an intervention (Hensel et al., 2015).
Team and organizational: Peer support programmes, reduced trauma caseload ratios, and psychological safety within teams are structural levers. A survey of emergency department nurses found that low manager support was a significant predictor of higher burnout and compassion fatigue, while high manager support contributed to greater compassion satisfaction (Hunsaker et al., 2015). Scheduling practices that prevent serial high-acuity exposure without decompression time matter, particularly in emergency, oncology, and palliative settings.
Clinical supervision and reflective practice: Regular supervision — especially restorative supervision — is one of the most consistently cited protective factors across professions. This is distinct from administrative oversight; it is a dedicated space to process the emotional weight of the work, notice early warning signs, and reconnect to meaning. Where supervision is unavailable or inaccessible, peer consultation and structured debriefing serve a similar function.
Support Clinician Wellbeing in Your Practice
HiBoop helps mental health practices monitor staff wellbeing and clinician burnout alongside patient outcomes, because your team's health is core to clinical quality.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the ProQOL a single score or multiple scores?
The ProQOL yields three separate subscale scores — Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress — which are interpreted independently. There is no single total score; the subscales measure different constructs and cannot meaningfully be summed.
What is a high Compassion Satisfaction score?
On the ProQOL, higher Compassion Satisfaction scores indicate greater reward and meaning derived from the caregiving role. A high score is a positive sign, suggesting you are sustaining the motivation and fulfillment that makes sustained helping possible.
Can this test diagnose compassion fatigue?
No. Screeners like this one are educational tools designed to raise self-awareness. A clinically elevated score on the Burnout or Secondary Traumatic Stress subscale should prompt conversation with a supervisor, occupational health professional, or mental health clinician — it does not constitute a diagnosis.
Who is most at risk for compassion fatigue?
Research shows compassion fatigue occurs across all helping professions. A 2015 meta-analysis found that higher caseload volume and frequency of trauma exposure, personal trauma history, and lower levels of workplace and social support were the strongest predictors of secondary traumatic stress in therapeutic workers.
References
- 1.Geoffrion S, Lamothe J, Morizot J, Giguère CÉ. Construct Validity of the Professional Quality of Life (ProQoL) Scale in a Sample of Child Protection Workers. J Trauma Stress. 2019;32(4):566-576.View source
- 2.Cavanagh N, Cockett G, Heinrich C, et al. Compassion fatigue in healthcare providers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurs Ethics. 2020;27(3):639-665.View source
- 3.Sinclair S, Raffin-Bouchal S, Venturato L, Mijovic-Kondejewski J, Smith-MacDonald L. Compassion fatigue: A meta-narrative review of the healthcare literature. Int J Nurs Stud. 2017;69:9-24.View source
- 4.Hensel JM, Ruiz C, Finney C, Dewa CS. Meta-analysis of risk factors for secondary traumatic stress in therapeutic work with trauma victims. J Trauma Stress. 2015;28(2):83-91.View source
Bill this assessment
The Compassion Fatigue Test qualifies for reimbursement under these CPT codes (US).
Last reviewed: Jun 3, 2026
Related Assessments
Explore complementary clinical tools and screeners