Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation v6 MID
Jump to section
The MID (Version 6.0) is a comprehensive self-report measure designed to assess pathological dissociation across a wide range of symptoms, experiences, and internal phenomena. Developed by Paul F. Dell, PhD, the MID evaluates both severity and structure of dissociative experiences, including amnesia, depersonalization, derealization, identity alteration, voice hearing, trance states, and other dissociative phenomena commonly seen in trauma-related disorders. It produces 23 primary clinical scales, 10 validity indices, and two global summary scores: DIS-S (Severity of Dissociation) and DIS-T (Trait Dissociation). The MID is one of the most detailed dissociation assessments available and is frequently used in complex trauma, OSDD, and DID evaluations. Interpretation requires clinical expertise.
Type: Comprehensive dissociation assessment
Population: Adults (18+)
Length: 218 items + validity scales
Format: Self-report
Completion Time: ~35–45 minutes
Here’s a clean single-sentence version: Use at intake for trauma or dissociation evaluations and then every 6–12 months in long-term treatment (with more frequent use only under specialist guidance), as it is not intended for routine or high-frequency symptom tracking.
Foundational Context
The MID was developed as a multidimensional alternative to brief dissociation screeners (e.g., DES), capturing the rich and varied phenomenology of pathological dissociation. Dell’s model conceptualizes dissociation as discrete, semi-autonomous systems of experience, each with distinct thoughts, emotions, bodily states, and sensory experiences. The MID operationalizes this framework through detailed questions covering internal voices, identity fragmentation, intrusions, amnesia, and somatoform dissociation.
Unlike short-form screeners that focus on general dissociative tendencies, the MID is built to map patterns, profiles, and interactions among dissociative symptoms. This makes it well-suited for differentiating among PTSD, OSDD, and DID, where symptom structures—not just severity—are diagnostically meaningful.
What the Assessment Measures
The MID produces information across:
- 23 primary dissociation scales, including:
- Amnesia
- Depersonalization
- Derealization
- Identity Confusion
- Identity Alteration
- Voice Hearing (internal and external)
- Trance/possession-like states
- Somatoform dissociation
- Thought insertion/withdrawal
- Emotional detachment
- Intrusions and internal conflict
- 10 validity and process indices, including:
- Response inconsistency
- Negativity bias
- Over-endorsement patterns
- Random responding indicators
- Summary Metrics
- DIS-S: overall dissociation severity
- DIS-T: trait dissociation profile
Interpretation Guidelines
MID scoring is based on scale averages (0–10) derived from item clusters.
General principles:
- Higher scale values → more intense or more frequent dissociative symptoms
- Interpretation is profile-based, not cutoff-based
- Validity indices must be examined before interpreting clinical scales
- Profiles help differentiate:
- Classic PTSD
- Complex PTSD
- OSDD (Other Specified Dissociative Disorder)
- DID (Dissociative Identity Disorder)
Summary scores:
- DIS-S reflects global dissociation severity
- DIS-T reflects chronic dissociation traits independent of acute state factors
Important caveats:
- The MID does not diagnose disorders
- Interpretation requires specialized training in dissociation and trauma
- Scores must be integrated with clinical interviews and collateral information
Note: Analysis for MID results is complex and best done using the provided MID Analysis document that comes with the measure. HiBoop has made it easy to export assessment data for detailed analysis.
Psychometric Properties
Reliability
- High internal consistency across most scales
- Strong reliability of summary scores
- Good stability over repeated administrations
Validity
- Excellent construct validity with trauma-related disorders
- Distinguishes DID, OSDD, and PTSD through pattern analysis
- Strong convergent validity with DES and structured clinical interviews
- Includes multiple validity indices to detect distortions or inconsistent responding
Administration Considerations
- Lengthy (218 items) and best suited for specialized clinics or trauma professionals
- Requires explanation to manage participant fatigue and emotional activation
- May surface distressing internal experiences—appropriate support is important
- Best administered in a safe, stable context with access to clinical support
- Not intended for rapid screening or general mental health settings
- Requires a structured interview (e.g., SCID-D, MID-Interview) for diagnostic follow-up
Limitations
- Length and complexity require significant time and clinician expertise
- Self-report may be influenced by shame, fear, or limited insight
- Some individuals with high dissociation may struggle with consistent reporting
- Not validated for youth populations
- The presence of severe trauma symptoms may amplify item endorsement without reflecting distinct dissociative structure
Copyright
© Paul F. Dell, PhD. All rights reserved.
References
- Dell PF. The multidimensional inventory of dissociation (MID): A comprehensive measure of pathological dissociation. J Trauma Dissociation. 2006;7(2):77-106. doi: 10.1300/J229v07n02_06. PMID: 16769667.
- Dell, P. F. (2009). MID manuals and psychometrics. Retrieved from https://www.mid-assessment.com/
Disclaimer
This content is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for clinical training, diagnostic interviewing, or medical evaluation. The MID is a complex assessment tool intended for use by clinicians experienced in trauma and dissociation.
Permissions
The MID and all related scoring materials are proprietary to Paul F. Dell, PhD. Use requires adherence to the author’s terms. Distribution of items, scoring keys, or interpretive manuals typically requires permission through the official MID website.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the MID diagnostic for DID or OSDD?
No. It informs the diagnostic process but requires clinical interviews for confirmation.
What do the DIS-S and DIS-T scores mean?
They summarize dissociation severity and trait dissociation but must be interpreted with scale profiles.
Does a high MID score always mean dissociative disorder?
Not necessarily. Other trauma conditions can produce elevated scores.
Can clients complete the MID without a clinician?
The measure is self-report, but interpretation requires professional training.
Why does the MID have validity indices?
To detect unreliable, inconsistent, or exaggerated response patterns.
Related Assessments
Operationalize this assessment
Bring Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation v6 MID into your digital workflow
Use our measurement-based care platform to automate scoring, monitor outcomes, and share results with care teams.
Need a guided tour? Request a demo to see how Multidimensional Inventory of Dissociation v6 MID fits alongside 50+ other validated scales.