PHQ-9 vs GAD-7 : Arbre décisionnel clinique
Guide fondé sur des données probantes pour choisir entre les outils de dépistage de la dépression et de l'anxiété dans les milieux de soins primaires et de santé mentale. Quand utiliser l'un ou l'autre, et quand utiliser les deux.
Arbre de décision rapide
1 What is the primary presenting concern?
Core depressive symptoms indicate depression-focused screening
Core anxiety symptoms indicate anxiety-focused screening
Comorbidity common - administer both for detailed assessment
Undifferentiated symptoms require dual screening for accurate diagnosis
2 Does the patient have a known diagnosis?
Use PHQ-9 for treatment monitoring and outcome tracking
Use GAD-7 for symptom severity and treatment response
Track both conditions separately to assess individual treatment response
Screening phase - cast wide net to identify primary condition
PHQ-9 vs GAD-7 : comparaison détaillée
PHQ-9
Patient Health Questionnaire-9
Points forts
- Directly maps to DSM-5-TR MDD criteria
- Item 9 screens for suicidality
- Widely validated in primary care
- Free and public domain
- Sensitive to treatment change
Limites
- May miss anxiety disorders
- Less specific in medically ill patients
- Somatic symptoms can inflate scores
Idéal pour
- Depression screening in primary care
- Treatment monitoring for antidepressants
- Suicide risk assessment (item 9)
- Outcome measurement in therapy
GAD-7
Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7
Points forts
- Screens for multiple anxiety disorders
- Good performance for GAD, panic, social anxiety
- Brief and well-tolerated
- Strong psychometric properties
- Sensitive to treatment change
Limites
- Less specific for individual anxiety disorders
- May miss depression if used alone
- Somatic anxiety can inflate scores
Idéal pour
- Anxiety disorder screening
- Treatment monitoring for anxiolytics
- Panic disorder detection
- Social anxiety identification
Scénarios cliniques : quand utiliser chacun
Primary Care Annual Wellness Visit
Universal screening for both depression and anxiety is recommended in primary care. Administering both takes <5 minutes and identifies comorbid conditions. 60% of patients with depression also have anxiety.
Patient Presents with Depressed Mood
Start with PHQ-9 to quantify depression severity and screen for suicidality (item 9). If PHQ-9 ≥10, add GAD-7 to rule out comorbid anxiety, which predicts worse depression outcomes and may require integrated treatment.
Patient Presents with Anxiety Symptoms
Start with GAD-7 to assess anxiety severity. If GAD-7 ≥10, add PHQ-9 because depression commonly coexists with anxiety disorders (50% comorbidity) and may be the primary driver of distress.
Monitoring Antidepressant Response
PHQ-9 is the primary outcome for depression treatment. SSRIs/SNRIs also treat anxiety, so monitor GAD-7 to capture full treatment benefit. Target: 50% reduction in PHQ-9 by 8 weeks.
Therapy for Comorbid Depression and Anxiety
Track both conditions separately to understand which symptoms respond to therapy. Some interventions (e.g., behavioral activation) may improve depression faster than anxiety, or vice versa. Adjust treatment based on differential response.
Emergency Department Psychiatric Evaluation
PHQ-9 item 9 screens for suicidal ideation. Positive screen (≥1 on item 9) requires detailed suicide risk assessment (C-SSRS). GAD-7 less critical in acute setting unless panic/anxiety is primary presentation.
Interprétation des présentations comorbides
Integrated treatment targeting both conditions. Consider SSRI/SNRI (treats both) + CBT. Higher risk of treatment resistance and worse functional impairment.
Depression-focused treatment. Antidepressant monotherapy or behavioral activation. Monitor for emergent anxiety with treatment.
Anxiety-focused treatment. SSRI/SNRI or CBT with exposure therapy. Monitor for depression development if anxiety is chronic.
Full C-SSRS assessment, safety planning, crisis intervention. Address depression as primary target. Anxiety increases suicide risk.